Top UN Court Dismisses Sudan’s Case Against UAE Over Allegations of Arming Rebels
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has dismissed Sudan’s case against the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which accused the Gulf nation of violating the genocide convention by arming the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) during Sudan’s ongoing civil war.
In a ruling on Monday, the ICJ stated it “manifestly lacked” the authority to pursue the case due to jurisdictional limitations tied to the 1948 genocide convention. Although both Sudan and the UAE are signatories to the treaty, the UAE has reserved exceptions regarding its obligations under the court’s jurisdiction.
Sudan had requested provisional measures from the ICJ, urging the UAE to prevent violence against the Masalit people in Darfur. However, the UAE characterized the case as a "publicity stunt," with an official from its Ministry of Foreign Affairs labeling it “baseless both legally and factually.” The UAE maintains it is not involved in the conflict and contends that the Sudanese Armed Forces, a party in the war, are using the allegations to divert attention from their own accountability.
Sudan’s civil conflict erupted in April 2023, fueled by escalating tensions between the military and the RSF, leading to widespread violence and humanitarian crises. Both factions have faced allegations of human rights abuses.
Despite claims from various quarters about the UAE’s support for the RSF, the UAE has consistently denied such involvement. This dismissal by the ICJ marks a significant moment in international legal efforts to address accusations surrounding the ongoing turmoil in Sudan. Further developments in this case and the broader conflict are anticipated.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
